ETIP Bioenergy-SABS ETIP Bioenergy-SABS
Menu
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Value chains
    • Feedstocks
      • Overview
      • Agriculture
      • Forestry
      • Waste
      • Algae and aquatic biomass
      • Plant biotechnology
    • Conversion technologies
      • Pre-treatment technologies
      • Advanced technologies
      • Conventional technologies
      • Electrofuels
      • Bioenergy retrofitting
    • Products & end use
      • Intermediates
      • Products
      • End use
  • Markets & Policies
    • Markets for Biofuels
    • Standards
    • Financing and investment for biofuels
    • Policy & Legislation about Bioenergy
    • Consultations for biofuels
    • EU and Member States Strategies, initiatives and official information relating to biofuels
  • Sustainability
    • Overview
    • Environmental impacts
    • Land availability
    • Land Use Changes
    • Certification
    • Food vs. Fuel Debate
    • Societal benefits of biofuels
    • Bio-CCS
  • Supporting Initiatives and Platforms
    • Related European Technology (and Innovation) Platforms & JTIs
      • ETPs and ETIPs - an overview
      • ETIP on Renewable Heating and Cooling (RHC-ETIP)
      • European Road Transport Research Advisory Council (ERTRAC)
      • ETP for Sustainable Chemistry (SusChem)
      • Forest-based Sector Technology Platform (FTP)
      • Plants for the Future ETP
      • Fuel Cells and Hydrogen JTI
      • Zero Emissions Platform (ZEP)
      • ART Fuel Forum (AFF)
    • EC RD&D Networks and Initiatives
      • European Energy Research Alliance Bioenergy Joint Programme (EERA Bioenergy JP)
      • Sustainable Transport Forum (STF) and Subgroup on Advanced Biofuels (SGAB)
      • ERA-NET Bioenergy
      • EAFO - European Alternative Fuels Observatory
  1. Home
  2. Value chains
  3. Conversion technologies
  4. Conventional technologies
  5. Biomass co-firing
  • EBTP Strategic Research Agenda and Strategy Deployment Document (SRA/SDD)
  • Strategic Energy Technology Plan
  • ETIP Bioenergy Position Paper on RED II
  • Moving to the next generation: New Chair and Vice Chair for the ETIP Bioenergy Steering…
  • ETIP Bioenergy - SPM9 2019

Biomass co-firing

Definition

Biomass co-firing stands for adding biomass as a partial substitute fuel in high efficiency coal boilers. Coal and biomass are co-combusted in boilers that have been designed to burn coal. For this purpose, the existing coal power plant has to be partly reconstructed and retrofitted. Co-firing is an option to convert biomass to electricity, in an efficient and clean way, and to reduce GHG emissions of the power plant

Co-firing processes

Over the past few years, the process of co-firing has seen a rapid development. Many plants have been retrofitted for demonstration purposes and others have been newly-built to allow for biomass co-firing.

There are three different concepts for co-firing biomass in coal boilers.

  • Direct co-firing – The biomass and the coal are burned in the same furnace. The mills for the grinding of the fuel and the burners may be separate. This depends on the biomass used and its fuel properties. This concept is most commonly used, because it is the easiest to implement and most cost-effective.
  • Indirect co-firing – In this concept, the solid biomass is converted to a clean fuel gas, using a biomass gasifier. The gas can be burnt in the same furnace as the coal. For this reason, it is also possible  to use biomass, which, for example is difficult to grind. The gas can be cleaned und filtered before use, to remove impurities . This principle is less researched then direct co-firing. 
  • Parallel co-firing – It is also possible to install a completely separate biomass boiler for increasing the steam parameters, like pressure or temperature,  in the steam system of the coal power plant. This method allows a high amount of biomass.

Motivation

Biomass co-firing is a good method to minimize greenhouse gases, because this process reduce net  CO2,  CH4, SOX and often NOX emissions, compared to coal combustion. The existing coal power plants can be retrofitted quickly and cost-effectively. The boiler efficiency drops only little or not at all, after adjustment to the new fuel mixture. Also a big advantage is the existing network of coal power plants.

Challenges

Biomass co-firing also faces some challenges, like  fuel supply, -handling and -storage. There is also a potential increase in corrosion and some ash deposition issues. If not carefully designed, co-firing involves some risks, like increased plant outages, possible interference with the operation of burner, furnace, boiler etc. In general, biomass is more expensive than coal. Even if biomass residues are used, which are available for free, these must be transported and pretreated.

  • Transesterification to biodiesel
  • Hydrotreatment to HVO
  • Ethanol fermentation
  • Anaerobic digestion to biogas
  • Small-scale combustion
  • Large-scale combustion
  • Biomass co-firing

Steering committee members

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • MORE
  • MORE
  • MORE
  • MORE
  • MORE
  • MORE
  • MORE
Copyright © 2021 ETIP-B-SABS 2. All Rights Reserved. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 825179

Privacy policy, Disclaimer & Copyright

Designed by ETA-Florence Renewable Energies